|
|
|
|
|
|
3. How did you learn of the ACNP Travel Award opportunity?*
|
4. How helpful was the application?*
|
|
|
6. How timely was the dissemination of information?*
|
|
|
8. The amount of communication/information from the Executive Office was:*
|
|
|
|
|
10. How helpful were your mentors before the meeting?*
|
|
|
12. How easy was it to contact your mentors at the meeting?*
|
|
|
14. How helpful was your meeting with your mentors?*
|
|
|
16. Do you feel that the amount of attention and direction that you received from your mentors at the meeting was sufficient?*
|
|
|
18. Do you have local mentors on whom you can rely?*
|
|
|
20. Would you like to have a more developed mentor relationship throughout the year with your mentors from the ACNP meeting?*
|
|
|
|
|
22. Please rate the overall scientific quality of the meeting.*
|
|
|
24. How good were the accomodations at the conference? *
|
|
|
26. How was the opportunity to interact with field leaders?*
|
|
|
28. How good was the opportunity to interact with peers?*
|
|
|
30. How would you rate the quality of the presentations?*
|
|
|
32. How would you rate the quality of the posters?*
|
|
|
34. Did the conference center lend itself to informal discussions?*
|
|
|
36. How would you rate the Travel Awardee breakout sessions?*
|
|
|
38. How would you rate the Travel Awardee breakfast with Judy Rapoport and Hakon Heimer?*
|
|
|
40. How would you rate the Travel Award lunch with Bob Freedman and Rene Etcheberrigaray?*
|
|
|
42. How would you rate the Saturday evening Travel Award reception?*
|
|
|
|
|
44. How was your overall experience as a Travel Awardee?*
|
|
|
46. Is the ACNP meeting an appropriate meeting for you to attend given your area of research?*
|
|
|
48. In the coming years, do you plan to apply for associate membership and/or membership in the College?*
|
|
|
50. Overall Comments/Suggestions -- Please tell us what we can do to improve the ACNP Travel Award program.
|