|
|
|
|
|
|
4. How helpful was the application? *
|
|
|
6. How timely was the dissemination of information? *
|
|
|
8. How good was the technical support for application? *
|
|
|
10. How helpful were your mentors before the meeting? *
|
|
|
12. How easy was it to contact your mentors at the meeting? *
|
|
|
14. How helpful was your meeting with your mentors? *
|
|
|
16. Were the Awardee meetings during the conference useful? *
|
|
|
18. What was your overall perception of the meeting? *
|
|
|
20. How were the accommodations at the conference? *
|
|
|
22. How was the opportunity to interact with field leaders? *
|
|
|
24. How was the opportunity to interact with peers? *
|
|
|
26. How would you rate the quality of the presentations? *
|
|
|
28. How would you rate the quality of the posters?*
|
|
|
30. How was the conference facility for informal discussions? *
|
|
|
32. How would you rate the Travel Awardee breakout session? *
|
|
|
34. How helpful were the Travel Awardee small groups? *
|
|
|
36. How was your overall experience as a Travel Awardee?*
|
37. Overall Comments on the Travel Award Program and ACNP Annual Meeting:
|